E-invoice / Rules / PEPPOL-EN16931-R040
E-invoice rule Peppol BIS Billing 3.0
PEPPOL-EN16931-R040: The allowance or charge amount
The allowance or charge amount should be the base amount times the percentage divided by 100, that is ?. The file says 35.00.
Original wording of the rule
Allowance/charge amount must equal base amount * percentage/100 if base amount and percentage exists
Source of the quotation: Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 (OpenPEPPOL, peppol-bis-invoice-3)
How to fix it
- Open the XML file and find the element
cac:AllowanceCharge/cbc:Amount. - Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
- Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.
A correct UBL 2.1 snippet
<cac:AllowanceCharge
xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
<cbc:Amount currencyID="EUR">100.00</cbc:Amount>
</cac:AllowanceCharge>
The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.
When it is reported
Profile: Peppol BIS Billing 3.0
How we rate it: error
Where we point in the file: /Invoice/cac:AllowanceCharge[1]/cbc:Amount
Related rules
- PEPPOL-EN16931-R010 The buyer electronic address (BT-49, cbc:EndpointID with a schemeID)
- PEPPOL-EN16931-R020 The seller electronic address (BT-34, cbc:EndpointID with a schemeID)
- PEPPOL-EN16931-R041 If the allowance or charge percentage (cbc:MultiplierFactorNumeric)
- PEPPOL-EN16931-R042 If the allowance or charge base amount (cbc:BaseAmount) is given
- PEPPOL-EN16931-R043 cbc:ChargeIndicator has to be true (a charge) or false (an allowance)
Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.