E-invoice / Rules / BR-DEX-05

E-invoice rule XRechnung 3.x

BR-DEX-05: In the XRechnung extension, schemeID=

In the XRechnung extension, schemeID="…" has to be a code from the ISO 6523 ICD list.

Original wording of the rule

[BR-DEX-05] Any scheme identifier in MUST be coded using one of the ISO 6523 ICD list.

Source of the quotation: XRechnung 3.x (itplr-kosit/xrechnung-schematron, Apache 2.0 licence)

How to fix it

1. Open the XML file and find the element cac:PartyLegalEntity/cbc:CompanyID.
2. Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
3. Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.

A correct UBL 2.1 snippet

<cac:PartyLegalEntity
    xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
    xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
  <cbc:CompanyID>SK2120000001</cbc:CompanyID>
</cac:PartyLegalEntity>

The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.

When it is reported

Profile: XRechnung 3.x

How we rate it: error

Where we point in the file: /Invoice/cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyLegalEntity/cbc:CompanyID

Related rules

• BR-DEX-01 The XRechnung extension allows only application/xml on top of the usual
• BR-DEX-04 In the XRechnung extension, schemeID=
• BR-DEX-06 In the XRechnung extension, schemeID=
• BR-DEX-07 In the XRechnung extension, the schemeID of the electronic address
• BR-DEX-08 In the XRechnung extension, schemeID=

Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.