What does BR-DE-30 mean?

E-invoice rule XRechnung 3.x

BR-DE-30: With a direct debit (BG-19) the bank assigned

With a direct debit (BG-19) the bank assigned creditor identifier (BT-90) has to be given in cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID with schemeID="SEPA".

Check your own file (free) Create an e-invoice

Original wording of the rule

[BR-DE-30] Wenn "DIRECT DEBIT" BG-19 vorhanden ist, dann muss "Bank assigned creditor identifier" BT-90 übermittelt werden.

Source of the quotation: XRechnung 3.x (itplr-kosit/xrechnung-schematron, Apache 2.0 licence)

How to fix it

Open the XML file and find the element cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID.
Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.

A correct UBL 2.1 snippet

<cac:PartyIdentification
    xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
    xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
  <cbc:ID>DODAVATEL-1</cbc:ID>
</cac:PartyIdentification>

The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.

When it is reported

Profile: XRechnung 3.x

How we rate it: error

UBL elements: cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID

Related rules

BR-DE-2 XRechnung requires seller contact details (BG-6)
BR-DE-3 The seller address is missing the city (BT-37, cbc:CityName)
BR-DE-4 The seller address is missing the post code (BT-38, cbc:PostalZone)
BR-DE-5 The seller contact details are missing the contact point name
BR-DE-6 The seller contact details are missing the telephone number

Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.