E-invoice rule EN 16931 schematron
BR-CL-19: Use a code from the UNCL 5189 code list
Use a code from the UNCL 5189 code list.
Original wording of the rule
[BR-CL-19]-Coded allowance reasons MUST belong to the UNCL 5189 code list
Source of the quotation: EN 16931 schematron (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, licence EUPL 1.2)
How to fix it
- Open the XML file and find the element
cac:AllowanceCharge/cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode. - Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
- Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.
A correct UBL 2.1 snippet
<cac:AllowanceCharge
xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
<cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode>95</cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode>
</cac:AllowanceCharge>
The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.
When it is reported
Profile: EN 16931, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, XRechnung 3.x
How we rate it: error
Where we point in the file: /Invoice/cac:AllowanceCharge[1]/cbc:AllowanceChargeReasonCode
Related rules
- BR-CL-17 Use a code from the UNTDID 5305 (S, Z, E, AE, K, G, O, L, M, B) code
- BR-CL-18 Use a code from the UNTDID 5305 (S, Z, E, AE, K, G, O, L, M, B) code
- BR-CL-20 Use a code from the UNCL 7161 code list
- BR-CL-21 Use a code from the ISO 6523 ICD code list
- BR-CL-22 Use a code from the CEF VATEX (for example VATEX-EU-AE) code list
Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.