E-invoice rule EN 16931 schematron
BR-63: The buyer electronic address (BT-49)
The buyer electronic address (BT-49) needs a schemeID attribute from the CEF EAS code list.
Original wording of the rule
[BR-63]-The Buyer electronic address (BT-49) shall have a Scheme identifier.
Source of the quotation: EN 16931 schematron (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, licence EUPL 1.2)
How to fix it
- Open the XML file and find the element
cac:Party/cbc:EndpointID. - Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
- Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.
A correct UBL 2.1 snippet
<cac:Party
xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
<cbc:EndpointID schemeID="0245">2120000001</cbc:EndpointID>
</cac:Party>
The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.
When it is reported
Profile: EN 16931, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, XRechnung 3.x
How we rate it: error
Where we point in the file: /Invoice/cac:AccountingCustomerParty/cac:Party/cbc:EndpointID
Related rules
- BR-61 With payment means 58 (credit transfer) the payment account identifier
- BR-62 The seller electronic address (BT-34) needs a schemeID attribute, for example
- BR-64 The item standard identifier (BT-157) needs a schemeID attribute, for example
- BR-65 The item classification identifier (BT-158) needs a listID attribute
Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.