E-invoice rule EN 16931 schematron
BR-52: Every supporting document (BG-24)
Every supporting document (BG-24) needs a reference (BT-122) in cbc:ID.
Original wording of the rule
[BR-52]-Each Additional supporting document (BG-24) shall contain a Supporting document reference (BT-122).
Source of the quotation: EN 16931 schematron (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, licence EUPL 1.2)
How to fix it
- Open the XML file and find the element
cac:AdditionalDocumentReference/cbc:ID. - Add or correct the element the way the wording of the rule above asks for.
- Save the file and check it again with our checker. It runs in your browser, the file is never uploaded.
A correct UBL 2.1 snippet
<cac:AdditionalDocumentReference
xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2"
xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonBasicComponents-2">
<cbc:ID>2026-0142</cbc:ID>
</cac:AdditionalDocumentReference>
The snippet is only the part of the document the rule is about. Put it in the right place inside your invoice; the namespaces are written here only so that the snippet reads on its own.
When it is reported
Profile: EN 16931, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, XRechnung 3.x
How we rate it: error
UBL elements: cbc:ID
Where we point in the file: /Invoice/cac:AdditionalDocumentReference[1]
Related rules
- BR-50 The payment account identifier (BT-84) is empty
- BR-51 The payment card number (BT-87) is longer than
- BR-53 If the VAT accounting currency code is present
- BR-54 An item attribute (BG-32) needs both a name (BT-160, cbc:Name)
- BR-55 A reference to a preceding invoice (BG-3) needs that invoice number
Our check is not complete: we do not check the XSD schema and we do not implement every rule, and a file that passes says nothing about whether the buyer or the Peppol network will accept it. Licences for the quoted wordings are listed in our sources.